by Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Identification of specific immune cell DNA methylation markers. (A) Methylation atlas, based on Illumina 450K arrays, composed of 32 tissues and sorted cells (columns). For each immune cell type we chose the top 10 CpGs that are hypomethylated (yellow) in the specific immune cell type and hypermethylated (blue) in other tissues and cells. This yielded 70 cell-specific CpG sites (rows) for seven different immune cell subtypes – B-cells, CD8 cytotoxic T-cells, CD3 T-cells, regulatory T-cells, eosinophils, monocytes, and neutrophils. (B) Methylation patterns of 17 loci, selected from the 70 shown in panel A, based on the presence of multiple adjacent hypomethylated CpGs within an amplicon of up to 160 bp. Each methylation marker (columns) was assessed using genomic DNA from 19 different tissues and cell types (rows). All 17 markers were amplified in one multiplex PCR. Shades of gray represent the percentage of fully unmethylated molecules from the indicated marker in DNA from the indicated cell type. (C) Spike-in experiments assessing assay sensitivity. Human leukocyte DNA was mixed with DNA from HEK-293 cells (human embryonic kidney cells) in the indicated proportions. Colored lines show the inferred percentage of DNA from the indicated immune cell type in the mixture, as a function of the percentage of leukocyte DNA in the mixture. The percentage of DNA from each immune cell type was calculated using markers specific to neutrophils (NEUT1, NEUT2, NEUT3), monocytes (MONO1, MONO2), eosinophils (EOSI2, EOSI3), B-cells (B-CELL1, B-CELL2, B-CELL3), CD3 T-cells (T-CELL1, T-CELL2), CD8 cytotoxic T-cells (CD8A, CD8B), and regulatory T-cells (TREG1, TREG2). Credit: DOI: 10.7554/eLife.70520
The immune systems work hard to keep us healthy and to protect us against bacteria, viruses, fungi, parasites, and cancerous cells. When the Immune systems are weakened, we’re at risk for illnesses and dangerous infections; when they’re overactive, we’re at risk for inflammation and autoimmune diseases. Therefore, accurate monitoring of the immune systems’ activity is vital to health.
Currently, the main way to test the immune system’s health is a blood test that counts immune (white blood) cells in the body. If the number comes out higher than normal, it may mean there’s an infection in the body that the immune system is fighting off. However, these blood tests often fail to catch immune system activity in the body’s remote tissues, such as those found in bone marrow, lymph nodes, and other organs. In those cases, patients must follow-up with invasive measures, such as biopsies and expensive and potentially harmful imaging modalities such as PET/CT scans and MRI’s. And even then, such advanced testing doesn’t always detect the problem.
Now, a group of scientists, led by Hebrew University of Jerusalem (HU) MD/Ph.D. student Ilana Fox-Fisher and Professor Yuval Dor at HU’s Institute for Medical Research-Israel Canada (IMRIC) has developed a novel method to monitor remote immune processes within those remote tissues and organs. The work, published recently in eLife, relies on two fundamental biological principles. First, dying cells release fragments of DNA into the blood stream. Second, the DNA of each cell type contains a unique chemical pattern called methylation.
Based on these principles, scientists can identify from which tissue the circulating fragments of DNA originated and infer disease states. For example, if a patient is battling breast cancer, there will be an elevation of DNA fragments (which is deposited into the blood stream after a cell dies) originating from breast cells and carrying the methylation hallmarks of breast cells, ditto for cardiac DNA fragments during heart attacks. “These methylation markers allow us to monitor human immune cell dynamics, and provide important information that isn’t accessible in standard blood cell counts,” explained Dor. “This novel tool can illuminate healthy and pathologic immune processes taking place deep within tissues, which are not accessible at present,” he added.
As part of their work, the researchers identified the specific DNA methylation patterns among immune and inflammatory cells types. This helped them detect DNA fragments that were deposited into the blood stream when those immune cells died. “A key finding is that immune-derived DNA fragments are not a simple reflection of circulating blood cells, but rather an accurate report of immune processes happening in the body,” explained Fox-Fisher. “Our research suggests that, in principle, doctors could monitor remote but critical immune processes by measuring the immune battle’s casualties, that is, immune-derived DNA fragments circulating in patients’ blood.”
The researchers tested their theory and found proof of concept by testing several medical conditions where the immune system is activated but standard blood cell counts are normal. The first was with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), a chronic allergic disease that affects kids and adults and is often difficult to diagnose. To date, EoE diagnoses require invasive endoscopic biopsies because most patients’ blood counts come back normal. However, probing further, Dor’s team found that EoE patients’ blood contains abnormally high levels of DNA fragments from eosinophils (as identified by their unique DNA methylation pattern). “Our new non-invasive blood test could go a long way in helping diagnosis and monitoring this disease,” added Fox-Fisher.
The team found similar success with lymphoma, a type of cancer that usually doesn’t show up in blood tests. However, the new blood test does pick up DNA fragments left by the immune system’s fight with lymphoma, without the need for bone marrow aspiration and further imaging. Currently, Fox-Fisher is conducting a study of people who’ve been vaccinated against COVID-19 to see whether the levels of DNA released from antibody-producing B-cells increased after they received the vaccine.
“We’re hopeful this new blood test will give clinicians a more accurate picture of the state of their patient’s health, beyond the standard blood counts which often do not tell the whole story and frequently necessitate invasive follow-up tests and biopsies,” concluded Fox-Fisher.
Leave a Reply