by Homa Shalchi, Baylor College of Medicine
Engineered p16 epimutation recapitulates key features of age-associated epigenetic silencing. A p16 DNA methylation profiles in cis-MEF following serial passaging (p). A schematic of the p16 promoter of the cis-element knock-in allele with the CpG maps is shown. B Kinetics of p16 promoter methylation and mRNA expression in ctr-MEF and cis-MEF. Methylation levels were averaged from CpGs from − 814 bp to − 589 bp relative to the TSS. Note that cis-MEF cells grew for more than 25 passages; in contrast, the controls (ctr-MEF) entered growth arrest at passage 8 (p8) via p16 up-regulation. The p16 gene expression is relative to β–actin. C UCSC Genome Browser tracks showing the DNA methylation status of p16, p19, and p15 in the INK4/ARF locus on chromosome 4. The chromosomal coordinates are annotated on the top. The WGBS tracks show DNA methylation profiling in ctr-MEF (p7) and cis-MEF (p10). The height of each bar represents the methylation level of an individual CpG between 0 and 1 (100%). Promoters are indicated by angled arrows, and the knock-in location is indicated by an asterisk. D Comparisons of p16 promoter methylation in cis-MEF before and after Ad-Cre mediated cis-element excision with increasing doses of DAC. The culture passage number of cis-MEF is at p23. E Side-by-side comparisons of p16 expression in cis-MEF under the same conditions as (D). For (D) and (E), data are shown as mean ± SEM with individual values from three independent experiments. P values were determined by a one-way ANOVA test. F dCas9-SunTagTET1-mediated targeted demethylation of p16 in cis-MEF. p16-gRNA indicates GFP-positive cells treated with a p16-specific gRNA that binds the promoter region from − 792 bp to − 769 bp relative to the TSS. Ctr indicates GFP-negative cells without targeted demethylation. Data are shown from three independent experiments. G Targeted promoter demethylation resulted in p16 gene reactivation. The culture passage number of cis-MEF is at p23. P values were determined by a two-tailed Student’s t-test. Credit: Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research (2023). DOI: 10.1186/s13046-023-02689-y
Colorectal cancer is the fourth most common and second deadliest cancer. How colorectal cancer develops is not well understood, but a team led by researchers at Baylor College of Medicine reports in the Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research that silencing the gene p16, even though the DNA itself does not change, can drive colorectal cancer progression in animal models.
The researchers also revealed a strategy that reduced tumor growth and improved survival in tumor-bearing mice, opening new possibilities for future targeted therapies in patients with gene p16 alterations.
“Years of research have shown that human colorectal cancer occurs in steps,” said corresponding author Dr. Lanlan Shen, professor of pediatrics—nutrition and member of the Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center at Baylor.
“First, a gene mutates leading to the formation of benign polyps, small clumps of cells that grow in the lining of the colon. Then, changes in a second gene drive the benign polyps to become malignant or cancerous growth. This process has not been studied well because, until now, we did not have an animal model that recapitulated the human cancer.”
In this study, the Shen lab and colleagues developed the first animal model of colorectal cancer that mimics the developmental process of the human condition. Using this model, the team investigated a particular change in the second gene called p16 and its effect in colorectal cancer growth.
Normally, gene p16 suppresses tumor growth, but as people age, p16 is silenced. Aging is the strongest risk factor for colorectal cancer. Silenced p16 is frequently found in colorectal cancer, which could explain why older people get this type of cancer more than younger people.
In this case, p16 is not silenced by a mutation of the DNA sequence of the gene itself, but by a different process called epimutation. Epimutations are chemical modifications such as attaching or removing a methyl chemical group in a gene. This chemical modification or methylation acts like a switch, turning p16 off when adding a methyl group and turning it on by removing the methyl group. This is important from the therapeutic point of view, because, unlike mutations which are difficult to reverse, epimutations are intrinsically reversible.
“Our animal model is the first to include both a genetic mutation called Apc that can initiate a benign tumor growth, and an epigenetic change, methylation of gene p16,” Shen said. “We conducted long-term survival and microscopy analysis of tumor development and progression and found that mice carrying combined Apc mutation and p16 epimutation had significantly shortened survival and increased tumor growth compared to those with Apc mutation only.”
Interestingly, colorectal tumors with the gene p16 turned off were growing in a microenvironment that suppressed the immune response against the tumor, favoring cancer growth. These observations prompted the researchers to test a combined treatment for these tumors.
“We combined a drug that inhibits DNA methylation of gene p16, turning it on, with another drug that removes the suppression on the immune response, allowing it to attack the tumor,” Shen said. “The combined drug treatment was more effective for improving survival in tumor-bearing mice than each drug alone.”
Research has shown that human colorectal cancers have many DNA methylation alterations, but the contributions of these modifications to tumor initiation and maintenance remain an important unmet need.
“We seek to better understand the mechanisms by which epimutations frequently observed in cancer cells contribute to cancer development and progression,” Shen said. “Our animal model is a valuable laboratory tool to study these mechanisms and also to screen potential treatments that could later be developed as therapies for patients.”
Leave a Reply